Labelling versus Understanding, News, Views, Opinions or Facts

Authors

  • Robert W. Service Jeffrey W. Dance Samford University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15520/sslej.v1i2.5

Abstract

The media in the United States are the “influentials†of the day. But, all too often their influence, purposeful or not, are agenda driven and based on incomplete and inaccurate “facts.â€The current authors’ experiences across the world say this is true in most other developed countries. Of course in some of the countries the press reports and government reports are the same, and in newly free or near free countries most do not trust their press. These assertionsare supported by antidotal evidence and careful analysis.  If you agree or not, read on to advance your thinking.By thinking to learn we learn to think.  We will provide insight into transferring understandable data into useful information.

The key research question is: are we better off if the academy took a different approach to teaching, learning and publishing? Shallow understandings,witnessed and documented, during discussions and press reports of current events reinforce the ‘opinions based on little knowledge’ phenomena that leads to the current quagmire of vastly opposing views. Readers of this current research and opinion manuscript are challengedto find scientific, medical and academically referred journal articles, and official governmental data before accepting the wisdom of the day or the pronouncements within this manuscript. In all we in the professoriate do keep in mind that“The work of the professor becomes consequential only as it is understood by others (Boyer, 2016: p. 13).â€

Downloads

Published

2016-07-08

How to Cite

(1)
Jeffrey W. Dance, R. W. S. Labelling Versus Understanding, News, Views, Opinions or Facts. sslej 2016, 1.