What Frequency Word Level Needed to have L2 Listening Comprehension
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15520/sslej.v3i08.2276Abstract
A successful listening comprehension integrates linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge which provide the foundation of
L2 listening comprehension.This study reviewed one of the factors of successful L2 listening comprehension because a
minimum level of word recognition is compulsory before non-linguistic knowledge. Linguistic knowledge through bottomup
processes is an essential aspectto obtain the accurate the incoming input. The ability to recognize phonological
features and frequency words becomes the bases of understanding L2 listening content and essentially which contribute
to L2 listening proficiency. word recognition from speech as a new construct of vocabulary brings a vital role in a
listener’s ability to combine both non-linguistic and linguistic knowledge while processing spoken language. Therefore,
it is possible to be valuable targets for tests to predict a listener’s ability to deal with L2 listening comprehension
tasks. Some studies revealed that word recognition in the 3000 frequent word families is the most predictive and
provide a unique contribution to standardized L2 listening test in ESP contest. This study found the lack of empirical
data about research on WRS in L2 listening comprehension. Thus, investigating the correlation between WRS and L2
listening comprehension constructed by researcher based on the learners’ listening need in EAP context can be further
investigated and the other factors are potentially involved.
References
References
language listening comprehension research. Language
Teaching. 2007;40:191–210.
2. Hulstijn J. Connectionist models of language processing and
the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia
software. vol. 16; 2003.
3. Bang S, Hiver P. Investigating the structural relationships of
cognitive and affective domains for L2 listening. Journal of
Second and Foreign Language Education. 2016;1(7):10–1186.
4. Stæhr L. Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and
writing. The Language Learning Journal. 2008;36:139–152.
5. Stæhr L. Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening
comprehension in English as a foreign language. vol. 31; 2009.
6. H VZ, Schmitt N; 2013. Incidental vocabulary acquisition.
7. Paribakht S, T W, S. What is the relationship between
the lexical profile of test items and performance on a
standardized English proficiency test? English for Specific
Purposes. 38. Second Language Lexical Knowledge and
Listening Comprehension International Journal of Listening.
2015;14:34–43.
8. Matthews J, Cheng J, O’Toole JM. Computer-mediated input,
output and feedback in the development of L2 word recognition
from speech. ReCALL; 2014.
9. Graham S, E M. Strategy Instruction in Listening for
Lower-Intermediate Learners of French. Language Learning.
2008;58(4):747–783.
10. Matthews J, J C. Recognition of high frequency words; 2015.
11. McQueen JM. Eight questions about spoken-word recognition.
In: Gaskell MG, editor. the oxford handbook of psycholinguistics.
Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 37–53.
12. Yeldham M, Gruba P; 2014. Toward an instructional approach
to developing.
13. Nation ISP. Learning vocabulary in another language.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
14. Matthews J, O’Toole JM. Investigating an innovative computer
application to improve L2 word recognition from speech.
Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2013;1(19):10–1080.
15. Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language
Learning;59:335–366.
16. Webb S, Rodgers P. The lexical coverage of movies. Applied
Linguistics. 2009;30:407–427.
17. ; 16.
18. as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System;52:1–13.
19. through L2 listening: A dimension’s approach.
System;41:609–624.
20. interactive second language listening. Language Teaching
Research;18(1):33.
