Cuff pressure manometer: An essential tool to reduce the incidence of ‘Post Operative Sore Throat

Cite this:
[1]
N. A. Y. A. S. S. LadiSushma D., “Cuff pressure manometer: An essential tool to reduce the incidence of ‘Post Operative Sore Throat”, ijmhs, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 61–63, Apr. 2015.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
492
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

Context: The most frequently reported symptoms following endotracheal intubation are sore throat and hoarseness. Excess endotracheal tube cuff pressure is a recognized cause of postoperative sore throat & tracheal injury. It is recommended to keep intracuff pressures within 20 – 30 cm of H2O & this can be easily done with an aneroid manometer. Cuff pressure measurement during anaesthesia is not widely practiced & is usually done with the ‘disappearance of leak by palpation’ method.

Aims: To evaluate whether intraoperative cuff pressure monitoring with a manometer is beneficial in reducing the incidence of POST as compared to the conventional disappearance of leak method and to detect over inflation if any by the later.

Methods and Material:

The study was carried out in two groups of 30 patients selected randomly, divided according to the method of cuff inflation.

  • Group A (disappearance of leak method)
  • Group B (manometry)

Patients were followed up for development of POST & its severity graded.

Statistical analysis tests used are: Chi Square Test. P value < 0.05 considered significant. SPSS version 11.5 was used.

Results: Both incidence & severity of incidence of POST were found to be higher in group A. (P value < 0.05)

Conclusions: It is necessary to monitor cuff pressure intraoperatively as it does help reduce incidence of POST

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:
“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”