LRS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ILIZAROV IN FRACTURES LONG BONES WITH SUBSTATIAL BONE LOSS

Abstract

Management of open fractures of long bones with bone loss by the conventional systems is very intratrcate and complex. Limb reconstruction system (LRS) is well thought-out as very contemptible, effectual method which and offers rigid stabilization of fracture fragments and with an easy access to soft tissue heed. The aim of the study was to determine the usefulness of LRS for treatment of open fractures of long bones of the lower limb with substantial bone loss. Methods: This prospective study included 25 cases of either sex aged between 11-70 years without any chronic ailment. Their clinical and radiological evaluation was done at first presentation and at specific intervals for signs of bone union and/or with associated complications if any. Results: The mean age of the patients was 35.6 years with male preponderance (80%). Most of the patients (80%) were injured by road traffic accidents (RTA). 50% of the cases were of Grade 2 (GUSTILO classification) type of fractures. The most common complication encountered was pin tract infections seen in 6 cases. We observed good results in 19 patients, moderate in 04 and poor in 02 patients using modified Anderson and Hutchinson’s criteria. Conclusions: LRS is a substitute/alternative to the conformist system of fixation in the primary management of open fractures of long bones with substantial bone loss. It is less cumbersome, economical to the patient and more patient friendly also. It is thus an authoritative prime single stage procedure.

Abstract

Management of open fractures of long bones with bone loss by the conventional systems is very intratrcate and complex. Limb reconstruction system (LRS) is well thought-out as very contemptible, effectual method which and offers rigid stabilization of fracture fragments and with an easy access to soft tissue heed. The aim of the study was to determine the usefulness of LRS for treatment of open fractures of long bones of the lower limb with substantial bone loss. Methods: This prospective study included 25 cases of either sex aged between 11-70 years without any chronic ailment. Their clinical and radiological evaluation was done at first presentation and at specific intervals for signs of bone union and/or with associated complications if any. Results: The mean age of the patients was 35.6 years with male preponderance (80%). Most of the patients (80%) were injured by road traffic accidents (RTA). 50% of the cases were of Grade 2 (GUSTILO classification) type of fractures. The most common complication encountered was pin tract infections seen in 6 cases. We observed good results in 19 patients, moderate in 04 and poor in 02 patients using modified Anderson and Hutchinson’s criteria. Conclusions: LRS is a substitute/alternative to the conformist system of fixation in the primary management of open fractures of long bones with substantial bone loss. It is less cumbersome, economical to the patient and more patient friendly also. It is thus an authoritative prime single stage procedure.

How to Cite
1.
Mittal, Dr. Simranjit Singh DKKKA. LRS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ILIZAROV IN FRACTURES LONG BONES WITH SUBSTATIAL BONE LOSS. ijmhs [Internet]. 10Dec.2018 [cited 24Mar.2019];8(12):217-24. Available from: http://innovativejournal.in/index.php/ijmhs/article/view/2370
Online First
Dec 10, 2018
Abstract Views
54
PDF Downloads
32
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
1.
Mittal, Dr. Simranjit Singh DKKKA. LRS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ILIZAROV IN FRACTURES LONG BONES WITH SUBSTATIAL BONE LOSS. ijmhs [Internet]. 10Dec.2018 [cited 24Mar.2019];8(12):217-24. Available from: http://innovativejournal.in/index.php/ijmhs/article/view/2370
Article reviewers