A study to evaluate the safety of open elective tracheostomy for patients under long mechanical ventilation

  • Dr. Sarmishtha De
Cite this:
[1]
D. S. De, “A study to evaluate the safety of open elective tracheostomy for patients under long mechanical ventilation ”, ijmhs, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2015.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
98
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

Introduction: The approach of elective open tracheostomy has proved to be safe in selected patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety of elective open tracheostomy as a routine ICU procedure without any selection criteria, considering its peri- and postoperative complications.

Methods: This Retrospective Analytical  study involved data of 50 of the randomly selected patients ( candidates / study subjects) . ) During this study, prior to tracheostomy brief history was noted about all the patients.

Results: In our study a total of 50 patients underwent bedside elec- tive open tracheostomy during the course of mechanical ventilation. Reasons for mechanical ventilation in above patients included polytrauma, head injury, organo-phosphorous poisoning, septicemia with multi organ failure, dengue encephalitis etc. In this study of 50 patients, 36 were male and 14 were female with a male to female ratio of 2.57:1 and average age of 37 years, youngest being 18 years and oldest being 68 years.

Conclusion: . Elective open tracheostomy seems to be a safe and simple procedure. It is cheaper than other techniques and should always be consid- ered as an option for ICU patients who are under prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Key Word : Elective open tracheostomy , ICU, Retrograde , Ventilation

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:
“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”