Evaluation of vision-related quality of life in individuals with vision loss

Cite this:
[1]
Gül Ulay and Bilgi Gülseven Karabacak, “Evaluation of vision-related quality of life in individuals with vision loss”, ijmhs, vol. 12, no. 05, pp. 1910–1919, May 2022.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
230
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

The research was carried out as prospective cross-sectional and descriptive in order to evaluate the quality of life and affecting factors related to vision in individuals with vision loss in various dimensions. The population of the study consisted of all patients (308) with vision loss who were hospitalized in the eye service of a training and research hospital affiliated to the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Turkey between 03.03.2011 and 03.06.2011, and the sample consisted of 247 patients who met the sampling criteria and agreed to participate in the study. The Patient Identification Form and the National Institute of Eye Health Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) were used for data collection.In data analysis; frequency, percentile, mean, standard deviation, Kolmogorov-Smirnov distribution test, Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests were used. As a result of the research; The Cronbach's Alpha value of the NEI-VFQ 25 was found to be reliable as 0.97. Considering that the mean scores of the patients from the subscales of the NEIVFQ 25 ranged between 38.77±15.43-76.64±30.47, the mean total score was 56.72±21.59, and the highest possible score was 100, it was determined that their visual-related quality of life was low. It has been determined that the quality of life related to vision is lower in female gender and individuals with a high degree of vision loss in the well-sighted eye.

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:
“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”