Evaluation of Anesthetic Drugs and Disposables Wastage in the Operating Room: Cross Section Study

Cite this:
[1]
Pooja Giriyapur, Ravi Madhusudhana, and Annadaneshwari B B, “Evaluation of Anesthetic Drugs and Disposables Wastage in the Operating Room: Cross Section Study”, ijmhs, vol. 12, no. 07, pp. 1941–1945, Jul. 2022.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
184
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

Context: The cost of anesthetic technique has three main components that is disposable supplies, equipments, and anesthetic drugs. More often they are overprescribed or wastage can happen.

Aim: To estimate the amount of anesthetic drug wastage in operation theatres (OT)  and to determine the amount of disposable wastage in OT’s conducted for surgeries.

Settings and Design: Cross section study conducted in 12 operation theatre room of tertiary care hospital.

Materials and methods: Drug wastage was considered as the amount of drug left unutilized in the syringes/vials after completion of case. An estimation of cost and wastage of drug was made.

Results: The study revealed that out of 34 total participants, majority of them were females (64.7%), with mean age of study participants is 45.44 ± 19.6 years. Drug wastage varied from 2.9%(adrenaline) to 100%(atropine), with an overall mean wastage rate of 54%.In addition to the drugs, a high amount of waste was the syringes (24.5%). With consumption rate of 95.4%.

Conclusions: Judicious use of drugs and disposables with appropriate interventional measures can effectively decrease this cost.

Key words: Anesthetic drugs, Cost, Operation theatre, Wastage

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:
“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”