An Analytical Study of Thyroid Nodules by Ultrasonography findings

  • Dr. Hulesh Mandle
Cite this:
[1]
Dr. Hulesh Mandle, “An Analytical Study of Thyroid Nodules by Ultrasonography findings”, ijmhs, vol. 1, no. 09, pp. 772–776, Sep. 2011.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
Article Views
88
Altmetric
1
Citations
-

Abstract

Introduction: Thyroid nodules are common, their prevalence being chiefly dependent on the identification technique. The estimated prevalence by palpation alone ranges from 4% to 7%, up to 67% by ultrasound, and fifty percent at autopsy with a noticeably higher incidence in iodine deficient provinces.This study was aimed to determine the ultrasound imaging findings of thyroid nodules in patients and correlate it with clinical records to develop a standardized diagnosis system for interpreting thyroid ultrasound imaging.

Methods: This Retrospective Analytical  study involveddata of 200 of the randomly selected patients ( candidates / study subjects ) who seek care for Thyroid Nodules between Aug 2009 to Nov 2009 were retrospectively identified.From Lew et al. guidelines ultrasound of nodule margins, suggestive of malignancy guidelines was adopted. A fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was recommended to the referring physician is required.[14,15] All participants provided informed written consent to participate in it.Patients with diagnosed thyroid nodules of more than 1 cm and who underwent   ultrasonography  were included.

Results: From all nodules, 21.50% were single and 78.5% were multiple nodules; 53 nodules (26.5%) were solid and 157 (78.5%)   cystic.   Concerning   echogenicity,   46   nodules (23%) were Hypo-echo , 44 nodules (22%) were Hyper-echo & rest were Iso echoic.  192 nodules (96.0%) had a regular edge. 59 nodules (29.5%) were without Halo. 157 nodules (78.5%) were larger than 15mm. According to histopathology results, the benign nodules were 92% and malignant cases were 08%

Conclusion:Based on the result of this study, thyroid nodule size must not be considered as a criterion for malignancy and thyroid nodules of any size must be suspected as malignant. Important criteria for malignancy include irregular edges, being Solid hypoechogenicity and being a single nodule respectively. However, the presence of calcifications in the nodule by US indicates a higher risk of malignancy and should prompt the clinician to evaluate the nodule further with repeat FNA.

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Content

Section

Source

Most read articles by the same author(s)