Capital Adequacy and Performance: A study of Licensed Commercial Banks in Sri Lanka

Cite this:
Anadasayanan.S, T. S. (2019). Capital Adequacy and Performance: A study of Licensed Commercial Banks in Sri Lanka. Innovative Journal of Business and Management, 8(3), 76–83. Retrieved from https://innovativejournal.in/index.php/ijbm/article/view/2490
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
474
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

Banks and financial institutions are special components of a healthy and wealthy financial system of the country. Banks are generally subject to minimum capital requirements based on an international set of capital standards, known as the Basel Accords. Therefore the present study an attempt to analysis the capital adequacy and performance of Licensed Commercial Banks (LCB) in Sri Lanka. For the study purpose all LCB’s data were drawn for the period of 1998 to 2016. In the light of the findings of this study, the study concludes that, the casual relationship between capital adequacy and performance of licensed commercial banks is statistically insignificant. This implies that performance in terms of return on assets is not majorly influenced by capital adequacy. It means that the various efforts by the monetary authority to review often times the capital base of the banking sector to maintain the sound capital base. Further, the study is in line with the Buffer Theory of capital adequacy which explains the reason why some of these banks in spite of their huge capital base run at loss. Functionally, adequate capital is regarded as the amount of capital that can effectively discharge the primary function of preventing bank failures by absorbing losses.

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

COPYRIGHT AGREEMENT AND AUTHORSHIP RESPONSIBILITY

 

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:

“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”