IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETENCY LEVEL ASSESSMENT: A CASE OF MALAYSIA PUBLIC SERVICE REMUNERATION SYSTEM

Cite this:
David P. Spicer, R. A. (2013). IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETENCY LEVEL ASSESSMENT: A CASE OF MALAYSIA PUBLIC SERVICE REMUNERATION SYSTEM. Innovative Journal of Business and Management, 1(02). Retrieved from https://innovativejournal.in/index.php/ijbm/article/view/382
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
352
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

The performance appraisal in the Malaysian Public Service (MPS) is a process and emphasis on increasing and reinforcing productivity, discipline, creativity, professional competence, service contribution, personnel traits, values, and ethics of the employees. This paper examines the employee’s perception towards the implementation of competency level assessment (CLA). Several research findings were reported to assess the practice of CLA in measuring employee’s performance in the MPS. Most of the research findings show that there is a significant relationship between all the examination components with the effective implementation of CLA in the MPS. However, the extent of CLA ability to accurately measure the employees’ performance in relation with the employees’ core business is still debatable. This paper offers wide perspectives of research finding on the implementation of CLA to measure public service performance. It is hopes it’s contributes to the body of knowledge on performance measurement issues by looking at the practices from the MPS.

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

COPYRIGHT AGREEMENT AND AUTHORSHIP RESPONSIBILITY

 

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:

“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”