Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Sciences


Open Access & Peer Reviewed
Advanced Search
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Publisher Information
  • Peer Review Policy
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Journal Reviewers
    • Editorial Policy
    • Manuscript Processing Time
    • Publication Charges
    • Editorial Team
    • Announcements
  • Register
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 10 No. 04 (2020): Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science
  4. Research Articles

Evaluation of Validity of New Biochemistry Analyzer ARK Diagnosis FALCON (Mini)

  • Neelam Gusain*, Anuradha B Patil
  • Neelam Gusain*, Anuradha B Patil
     Department of Biochemistry, Alfalah School of Medical Science and Research Centre, Haryana, India

    Search for the other articles from the author in:
    Google Scholar | PubMed | BMJ Journal

Cite this:
[1]
Neelam Gusain*, Anuradha B Patil, “Evaluation of Validity of New Biochemistry Analyzer ARK Diagnosis FALCON (Mini)”, ijmhs, vol. 10, no. 04, pp. 923–929, Apr. 2020.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
283
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
Share
   PDF      PubMed      DOAJ  

Abstract

Introduction: Medical laboratories provide information and services
that contribute to the effective healthcare delivery of the system. Laboratory
results permit physicians and different healthcare professionals
to make acceptable evidence-based diagnostic or therapeutic decisions
for their patients.
Methods: The Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) Guideline
was used to determine the efficiency of ARK Diagnosis FALCON
mini based on its Precision and Linearity. Glucose and Urea were
analyzed, precision was done using three levels of pooled sera twenty
sample of each level and for linearity testing done by preparing five
different dilutions. The performance of the ARK Diagnosis FALCON
mini is compared with manufacture’s claim. The results were presented
as mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CV %) and
correlation coefficient (r) by using SPSS.
Results: For Precision, Calculated CV% of all three levels was within
the manufacturer’s CV%. The linearity results were also within the allowable
range. The performance comparison revealed that the expected
value and observed value are comparable, with Correlation coefficients
(r) >0.9978 for glucose and urea. Precision and linearity both are within
the allowable criteria.
Conclusion: The cross-sectional study conducted to see whether the
newly installed analyzer meets the performance criteria. Our results
demonstrate that intraassay precision and linearity of the ARK analyzer
meets the requirement of laboratory as per the CLSI guidelines. This
gives a green signal for installation of the instrument. Maintaining the
quality thereafter is another challenge and an ongoing process it should
be maintained by internal and external quality control protocol.
Keywords: Validation study, Precision, Linearity, Glucose, Urea, CLSI,
CV%.

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Part of special issue:

Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science

Article Metrics by Journal Systems

  • Citations not available
  • Readers 283
  • Download 148

  • Altmetric Attention score:
Altmetric badge

Share this article

Section

Source

  • How to Cite
  • [1]
    Neelam Gusain*, Anuradha B Patil, “Evaluation of Validity of New Biochemistry Analyzer ARK Diagnosis FALCON (Mini)”, ijmhs, vol. 10, no. 04, pp. 923–929, Apr. 2020.
    More Citation Formats
    ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
    Download Citation
    Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
  • Issue Vol. 10 No. 04 (2020): Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science
  • Section Research Articles

License

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:
“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”

Journal Information

  • Home
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Archive

Guidelines

  • Authorship Criteria
  • Reviewers Guidelines
  • Editorial Policy
  • Copyright Policy

Policies

  • Authorship Criteria
  • Reviewers Guidelines
  • Editorial Policy
  • Copyright Policy

Contact Us

  • Phone:(+91) 7566119900
  • Address:93 Divya Vihar, Near Rawati Range, Indore India
  • Website:www.innovativejournal.in

More information about the publishing system, Platform and Workflow by OJS/PKP.

Copyright © 2022 Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. All Rights Reserved

Published By: Innovative Journals