VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIALS IN MALE PATIENTS OF PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA AND AGE MATCHED CONTROL MALES

Cite this:
[1]
R. K. P. B. P. N. Pooja Batra, Ramji Singh, Smita Singh, “VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIALS IN MALE PATIENTS OF PRIMARY OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA AND AGE MATCHED CONTROL MALES”, ijmhs, vol. 3, no. 3, Oct. 2013.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
192
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the latency and amplitude of P100 component of pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PRVEP) in a cohort of male patients having primary open angle glaucoma with those of age matched controls. This comparative case- control study was conducted in the Neurophysiology unit of the Department of Physiology of a rural Medical college of Central India. The study comprised of PRVEP recordings from 356 eyes (108 POAG eyes and 248 control eyes) which were performed with the stimulus configuration consisting of the transient pattern reversal method using an Evoked Potential Recorder (RMS EMG EP MARK II). Agewise comparison of VEP component in our study subjects revealed that the mean P100 latency of POAG patients was significantly (p<0.05) longer than the mean P100 latency of the controls in all the age groups (from 40-79 years). The mean amplitude of P100 in POAG patients was significantly (p<0.05) diminished compared to that of controls.

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:
“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”