Mammographic And Sonomammographic Evaluation Of Breast Masses With Pathological Correlation

  • Nandan Kumar Shilpa N
Cite this:
[1]
N. K. Shilpa N, “Mammographic And Sonomammographic Evaluation Of Breast Masses With Pathological Correlation”, ijmhs, vol. 6, no. 5, Sep. 2016.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
311
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in women. All palpable breast masses require proper work up, early diagnosis and management. Triple assessment includes clinical examination, imaging and fine needle aspiration cytology or core biopsy. Aim: To evaluate the role of mammography and sonomammography in diagnosing breast mass lesions individually and when combined, with pathological correlation. Materials and methods: 126 breast masses from 115 patients were evaluated with Sonography and mammography. The lesions were assessed based morphological criteria. Pathological correlation was done, which was taken as standard. Sensitivity, specificity were derived for Sonography and mammography individually and also combined. Results: overall sensitivity and specificity for mammography are 79.5 and 80.4 respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing breast lesions with Sonography are 85.45 and 89.31. Combining the mammography and USG, sensitivity, specificity were 94.25 and 96.2 respectively. These results were significantly high than mammography or USG alone. Conclusion: Present study confirms the higher combined sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for ultrasonography and mammography for detection of breast masses than individual modality.

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:
“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”