A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern in Geriatric Patients at Local Secondary & Tertiary Care Hospitals

Cite this:
[1]
D. R. G. . Ghritlahare, “A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern in Geriatric Patients at Local Secondary & Tertiary Care Hospitals”, ijmhs, vol. 9, no. 5, May 2020.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
133
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

Introduction : As the number of drugs taken by geriatric patients and the incidence of ADR is high in this age group, it becomes increasingly essential to study patterns of drug use. This study aimed to analyze the medication utilization patterns using WHO core prescribing indicators.

Methods: Cross Sectional  & Analytical study using WHO core indicators and Beer’s criteria as an assessment tool for potentially inappropriate medication for older adults.The top 10 drugs were classified according to WHO-ATC (Anatomical Therapeutic Code) Classification system with DDD (Defined Daily Dose) 

Results: A total of 200 Geriatric patients were taken in the study. . The average number of drugs per encounter was 7.16. Drugs acting on the cardiovascular system were the most commonly prescribed. Ranitidine was the most commonly prescribed drug. The study shows the present prescribing practices in the hospital related to higher polypharmacy and inappropriate medication use.

Conclusion: To enhance drug therapy for geriatric patients, it is essential for prescribers to make aware of the Beers criteria and should be surely followed for good health care outcomes in the elderly. A systematic medication chart review by the clinical pharmacist can minimize the frequency of prescribing drugs without indications and thereby decrease polypharmacy.

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:
“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”