Study of i-gel and cLMA for their effect on hemodynamic changes in paediatric patients and its statistical significance

Cite this:
[1]
N. . Jain, Susheela Taxak, and Karampal Singh, “Study of i-gel and cLMA for their effect on hemodynamic changes in paediatric patients and its statistical significance”, ijmhs, vol. 11, no. 02 (Mar - April), pp. 1603–1614, Mar. 2021.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
305
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

AIM- Study on supraglottic airway devices, i-gel and cLMA for their
effect on hemodynamic changes in paediatric patients and its statistical
significance.
Methods - We did a prospective, randomised single blind study on
Eighty patients of either sex belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists
(ASA) physical status class I or II, between 6 months to
8 years of age, scheduled to undergo elective surgery for less than one
and half hour duration under general anaesthesia. With this supraglottic
airway devices we studied the hemodynamic changes on pediatric
cases.
Results - The heart rate, systolic BP, diastolic BP and mean BP were
measured at different intervals for both i-gel and cLMA group and we
found no statistically significant differences in heart rate, SBP, DBP
and mean BP in both the groups.
The oxygen saturation which is recorded at different intervals in our
study on both the groups (i-gel and cLMA) remained 100%.
Conclusion -The i-gel and cLMA are effective and safe devices for use
in children. They were comparable for hemodynamic and ventilatory
parameters.
Keywords: cLMA, i-gel, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure,
mean blood pressure, paediatric, oxygen saturation, supraglottic
airway devices

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:
“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”