BILATERAL VARIATION OF RENAL ARTERY AND ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE IN NORTH INDIAN POPULATION

Cite this:
[1]
H. M. H. M. U. N. Hassan Khalid, Hussain Nigar, “BILATERAL VARIATION OF RENAL ARTERY AND ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE IN NORTH INDIAN POPULATION”, ijmhs, vol. 3, no. 3, Oct. 2013.
© 2022 Interactive Protocols
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Article Views
243
Altmetric
1
Citations
-
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
   PDF  

Abstract

Background: Classically each Kidney is supplied by a single renal artery originate from abdominal aorta. With the advent of laparoscopic renal surgeries and donor nephrectomies, it becomes mandatory for the surgeons to understand the abnormality or variations in the renal vasculature. The aim of present study is to highlight incidence of bilateral variations of renal artery in North Indian Population.
Material and Methods: The materials used for present study comprises 56 adult cadavers of both sexes (40 male and 16 female) from North Indian origin. During routine abdominal dissection conducted for medical undergraduates at Department of Anatomy, kidneys along with their arteries were explored and the morphological variations of renal arteries were recorded.
Results: We observed variations of renal arteries in 22 cadavers (39.2%). Bilateral variation were present in 12 cadavers (21.4 %%), unilateral in 10 cadavers (17.8%). The unilateral variation was present right side in 3 cadavers (5.3%) and left side in 7 cadavers (12.5%).
Conclusion: Awareness of bilateral variations of renal artery is necessary for surgical management during renal transplantation; repair of abdominal aorta aneurysm, urological procedures and for angiographic interventions.

KEYWORDS:

 Special Issue

Article Metrics Graph

Chart Graph | Range Graph

Content

Section

Source

License

All paper submissions must carry the following duly signed by all the authors:
“I certify that I have participated sufficiently in the conception and design of this work and the analysis of the data (wherever applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I believe the manuscript represents valid work. I have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. Neither has the manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my authorship been published nor is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in an attachment. Furthermore I attest that I shall produce the data upon which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees, if requested.”